Brazil out, Uruguay win on penalties, most fouls in 2024 Copa America


If you were expecting a beautiful, free-flowing encounter between two South American giants, you picked the wrong game.

This was the dirtiest game in this year’s Copa America so far with 41 fouls, surpassing the 37 in Chile’s 0-0 draw against Peru on the second day. Uruguay’s Nahitan Nandez was also sent off for a lunge on Rodrygo and there were four more yellow cards on a fractious evening in Allegient Stadium, Las Vegas.

After 90 minutes plus stoppage time of pushes, prods and half-chances, it went down to a penalty shootout — and it was Marcelo Bielsa’s Uruguay who booked their place in the semi-final against Colombia.

Jack Lang and Thom Harris dissect the chaos…


What happened in the penalty shootout?

There was more pushing and shoving before the shootout commenced, with the 10 men of Uruguay trying to make their presence felt.

Eder Militao stepped up first for Brazil and saw his effort saved by Sergio Rochet.

Militao Brazil scaled


(Frederic J. Brown/AFP via Getty Images)

Uruguay converted their first three spot kicks before Douglas Luiz hit the post, then Jose Maria Gimenez missed.

Ultimately, Manuel Ugarte stepped up to score the decisive penalty for Uruguay, who won the shootout 4-2.


How did Uruguay stop Brazil?

Top-level footballers get used to being put under pressure by the opposition team. When you have the ball, the other lot want it back. It’s a law of nature.

Playing against a Marcelo Bielsa side is a different thing entirely, however. His players don’t so much close people down as harass them in packs of two, three, four. It looks horrible to deal with, frankly. It is also one of the toughest examinations you can face.

Brazil struggled mightily here. Alisson was often reduced to lumping the ball upfield, to no one in particular. When they did try to pass it out from the back, the entire operation looked fraught with danger. Joao Gomes had his pocket picked a few times but he was not the only one to fail the test. It was no coincidence that the Selecao’s best chances in the first half came from scrappy, confused chunks of play; there was no sense that they were ever building attacks in any organised manner.

Uruguay, Brazil


Uruguay disrupted Brazil’s rhythm (Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images)

There was, in fairness, a slight retrenchment from Uruguay after the break. It’s hard to maintain that level of intensity for 90 minutes, after all. The troubling thing for Brazil was that they still didn’t manage any convincing patterns of play. They looked like a team waiting for something to happen.

In a way, this is forgivable. This is still a team in construction. Dorival Junior only took charge in March and things were even worse before he turned up. He talks a lot about “following the steps”. There were, in fairness, positives to be taken from the way Brazil blunted Uruguay’s energetic attack.

Still, this is Brazil. There is an expectation that they be protagonists, as Dorival well knows. Indeed, as his team laboured away, it was hard not to think back to Andreas Pereira’s provocative words on the eve of the game. “Uruguay dream of having Brazil’s team,” he said.

Not on this evidence, they don’t.

Jack Lang


How did Endrick get on?

The 17-year-old was making his first start for Brazil given Vinicius Junior, watching from the stands, was suspended after accumulating yellow cards in the group stage.

Officially, Endrick was only fouled three times in the opening 45 minutes. Anybody watching will be able to tell you that statistic is… wrong.

Tournament football is ruthless — the importance of winning only ramped up on the international stage — so it is no surprise that Uruguay chose to test the resolve of the inexperienced teenage striker from the start. In a game like this – tense, tetchy and with everything on the line – any sign of weakness represents a potentially precious way through.

It’s a testament to his temperament, then, that Endrick wasn’t fouled at all in the second half. Brazil’s No.9 bounced back from most of the shoves and pushes sent his way, and even when the referee’s whistle did not come to his rescue, as it didn’t after he was charged into by Federico Valverde on 18 minutes, he was quickly back up to his feet to get knocked back down again. This time by Ronald Araujo, sneakily, mercilessly, while the ball was far away.

Endrick

Away from the physical battle, Endrick did not have too much to work with in a cagey but competitive game. Much of the football was played in the middle third, Uruguay’s relentless man-to-man press leaving no Brazilian with any time on the ball in the attacking half. He drifted from side to side, trying to show for the ball, but whenever he received it, he had a South American giant on his back, and rather snatched at a left-foot shot with six minutes remaining.

Thom Harris


Was Nandez’ red card justified?

In short, yes.

For all the quality on show, this was a fiercely competitive game, and the physicality got slightly out of hand. There were 40 fouls all in all — the most in the tournament so far — and the referee would have been justified penalising plenty more crunching collisions and shoves in the back throughout.

Nandez is a spiky little customer, the very embodiment of what Uruguayans call ‘garra charrua’, their trademark never-say-die attitude. His aggression and desire to get in front of his man also personifies the intent of Bielsa’s system, looking to win back the ball as quickly and as close to the opposition goal as possible.

That he is even playing at right-back is testament to his willingness to go above and beyond: he is, by trade, a midfielder. If you were being generous, you might call his tackle on Rodrygo a midfielder’s challenge. Either way, it was crude and dangerous. The only surprise was that a VAR review was required for the referee to reach that conclusion, replacing the initial yellow card with a red.

Uruguay


Nandez tried to plead with referee Dario Herrera (Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images)

The still image was damning, studs firmly in contact with Rodrygo’s standing leg. It marked Nandez’s 12th foul of the tournament — only Brazil’s Bruno Guimaraes has committed more.

Uruguay survived, but with Ronald Araujo limping off to injury, and Nandez suspended, they will head into a semi-final against two-year unbeaten Colombia without two of their defensive pillars.

Thom Harris & Jack Lang


What’s next for each team?

Uruguay will face Colombia in the semifinals on Wednesday, July 10 at 8:00 p.m. ET (Bank of America Stadium, Charlotte, NC)

Brazil are eliminated from the tournament.


Recommended reading

(Top photo: Getty Images)



Source link

About The Author

Scroll to Top